Collecting my notes on howNonviolence, Anarchy Consensus and Democracy are the same thing. So far this doesn't even qualify as a draft...
(to the tune of wwp, with BuildingActivities and much more as the content)

Nonviolent Anarconsensual Democracy

It's about community, and about freedom.

It's about what we do, and why we do it.

It's about what's real, and what we make of that reality.

It's about being in the moment, and root/systemic causes. (strategic responses)

-----------

?? It's about healing what's messed up, and creative wonderfulness from a baseline of plenty.

Nonviolence

Assume that your "enemy" can be moved by the truth if it is, powerfully, persistently and compassionately told and acted upon.

[social change and spiritual history and implications are generally ignored, and it is often framed as an option in conflict resolution]

spirit is to do things *with* others holding them as human even if you disagree with what they are doing at the moment.

As much about passive/non-physical violence as active/physical violence.

blog

"A peace that comes from fear and not from the heart is the opposite of peace."
    --Gersonides

nonviolent precursor to American Revolution

"It is more important to root out the violence latent in the structure of society than to make peace when open violence breaks out."
    --Jayaprakash Narayan, introduction to Vinoba's Third Power

http://del.icio.us/tag/nonviolence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolence

http://ourpla.net/cgi/pikie?NonViolence

"It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence."
    --Mohandas Gandhi


Anarchy

No one in governance, freedom for all.

freedom quote?

Rule by no one - everyone is free, because no one has power over anyone else.

Some anarchists' do not believe that large-scale structures (e.g. states, much less global structures) can be built without domination structures, and advocate down-shifts to local, perhaps all the way to . 

1) There usually are power relationships whether you want them or not, so better to be transparent with them. (cf first part of Tyranny of Structurelessness)

2) If you don't create/participate in larger structures, you have less influence on the development of other, perhaps large/powerful neighbors. What stops some developing nasty attitudes/tech and strong-arming small groups? So, an innoculation approach, admitted to be laid open to the risk that the structures that we set up could turn on anarchy over time, building up with bureaucracy, dead rule-making, corruption, coercion

Power-over vs. power-under

http://ourpla.net/cgi/pikie?AnArchy

http://del.icio.us/tag/anarchy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy

http://ourpla.net/cgi/pikie?AnArchy

To  the degree violence

Instead, we have to learn to get along with the people around us. Some people imagine this is only possible below a certain scale of social organization.


, or requiring any people to have inordinately more power than others.

A lot of it is just relalizing the extent to which we already are free. And then we have to cope with this:

"Everything that lives, does so under the categorical condition of decisively interfering in the life of someone else..."
    --Mikhail Bakunin

http://

Blog

Consensus

The spirit is for people to not unduly  impact others without their consent.

An approach to deciding/acting together in which any objection is taken most seriously - as an opportunity to improve.

[As a 'voting process' this can miss the point, becoming a heartless and dry "Robert's Rules of Consensus".]

[Social pressure to not block can become the basis of an unofficial power structure]

==

Law without coercion hovering behind it as punishment or enforcement,

"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
    --John Stuart Mill, On Liberty

Schutt matls?

http://del.icio.us/tag/consensus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus

http://ourpla.net/cgi/pikie?ConSensus


Blog 

Democracy

Substantial, meaningful participation of the people in all aspects of governance -

[Manufactured consent - the current post-1984 situation in which the truth is known, but somehow the news/media context makes it seem irrelevant]

Whether directly or with representation and/or federalism, the spirit is, Rule of the people. It could be consensus and a mix of voluntary and random representation to temporary or long-term formal rule-making and consultative bodies. A nonviolent, anarchic society that operated by consensus would be deeply democratic.

"The deliberative sense of the community should govern."
    --Alexander Hamilton

NCDD

Churchill quote, my response

"I had never thought of democracy as a daily practice."
    --Steve Brigham, on the Great Peace March

http://del.icio.us/tag/democracy

http://del.icio.us/tag/deliberation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deliberation

http://ourpla.net/cgi/pikie?DemoCracy

http://ourpla.net/cgi/pikie?DeliberaTion

Greece, U.S., Native Americans

What to do?

learn/practice/experiment/share

Scale

Individual - Focusing, NVC,

Group - Facilitation, leaderful,
Global - harder- PDCs?

mindful of reactivity, and against or judgemental thinking.
Economics

"Philanthropy is commendable, but it must not cause the philanthropist to overlook the circumstances of economic injustice that make philanthropy necessary."
    --MartinLutherKingJr

"Money is like muck, not good except it be spread."
    --Francis Bacon

"Money is a concretization of a broken model of value."
 --JohnAbbe

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem"
    --John Paul Getty

"An apt and true reply was given to Alexander the Great by a pirate who had been seized. For when that king had asked the man what he meant by keeping hostile possession of the sea, he answered with bold pride. "What thou meanest by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, whilst thou who dost it with a great fleet art styled emperor."
    --St. Augustine

"I believe that there will ultimately be a clash between the oppressed and those who do the oppressing. I believe that there will be a clash between those who want freedom, justice and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation. I believe that there will be that kind of clash but I don't think it will be based on the color of the skin."
    --Malcolm X

"The thought that life could be better is woven indelibly into our hearts and our brains."
    --Paul Simon
There are people who identify as anarchist but believe in capitalitism, or at least that property rights should be held up (probably contracts too?).
Power

Personal-to-global/universal

Currencies of power
Deliberative/Creative Councils



Social Singularity, Vinge, de Chardin



One reason that domination has succeeded is that highly evolved domination decision-making has won against domination-naive nacd decision-making. In order to turn the tide we must come up with better nacd decision-making, which can succeed in relationship with domination.



At root, democracy is two sides of a coin. One side is people's recognition of already-existing freedom and power ("we hold these truths to be self-evident", recognizing rights rather than granting them). Governments from dictatorships to the so far not-so-democratic democracies operate primarily by the obedience of the people. To the extent we realize that the system depends on this, our power becomes available to us.

The other side of the coin

More democratic systems, which give/recognize and tap into the real power of everyone, often raise concerns about lack of wisdom and/or intelligence. However

There are group practices and facilitators who


(When awareness of our freedom occurs briefly among a large number of unorganized people, we often get riots and chaos, (other beliefs - can't have peace without controlling governance) the awareness disappears again, the moment is seen by participants as a temporary break that allowed them to act, rather than how things really are - What's the point of this? hm, anarchy, vulnerability to domination of no-large-structures strategy)



1 (expression/empathy, interdependence)

2 (strategies/needs, req/demands, law/spirit, behavior/motivation implexpl)

3 (observation/evaluation, objective/subjective, truth/nonviolence, territory/map, thank you/please)

It's about appreciating things as they are, and wanting better.

Illusions of Domination System